Thus, it is out, tonight, to communicate, the AC Milan and Real Madrid officially, will bear the Ricky Kakà effective immediately camiseta blanca. In the area 65 million transfer fee, and 9 million net for the players stand, official figures were not disclosed.
Galliani: A proposito: il rinnovo di Kakà? Arrivera presto. Comunque ribadisco: dovranno tagliarmi la mano, ma non per la sua mai firmerò cessione.
"You have to cut my hand, because I will never sign its sale."
Whether the sale of key players and pallone d'oro 2007 and the resulting new signings will be represented as a sporting asset for the club will be showing the upcoming signings and the next few seasons. A veritable watershed in the club's transfer policy, marked all: The European giants AC Milan, which is still officially classified as "most decorated club in the world" means that played in the past two year gap finals of the Champions League, which until a few years with a seemingly unlimited budget, and gave Europe's top players committed only sports worthless player, is history. In the future we will see an AC Milan, who are largely itself must bear the financial, which requires the model of AS Roma, Udinese and Arsenal, following young players and add at the peak of their capacity, to offset the balance.
No, I repeat not, a European club with title aspirations carries herself, even if you look at clubs as an excellent role model with our new philosophy, which does not play in the championship of the Champions League a prominent role. This aspect will be ignored by the grandees of AC Milan happy. Ricky Kaka The sale marks a transition, a revolution, the white flag of Europe's top clubs, who must continue to try to earn Champions League participation by player sales and profits.
"Kakà e il Milan risposto al Real Madrid hanno già in passato. Non vedo alcuna ragione per cambiare questo atteggiamento. E poi la prova di attaccamento ai colori rossoneri data in questi giorni mi sembra eloquent ... "
"Kakà Milan and Real have already answered in the past. I see no reason to depart from this position. Moreover, I feel that bind to the red and black colors in these days speak volumes to ... "
(Silvio Berlusconi, 23.01.2009)
Real effective Kakà get less money (only 50% of image rights). Galliani mention of the tax aspect is only of interest to the club, not for the players, players always negotiate net totals. Furthermore, I think it is normal for a player to move to where he no longer feels the trust of his employer, who wants to sell it within 6 months, twice to the nearest - no player in the world remains "for the fans with such a club. Despite previous statements, the association's leaders that they would "try to keep Ricky" to operate but "foreign clubs with other sums," it is clear that changes Kakà against his stated desire to Real, sold by a club owner who, although a new strategy it has decided to officially but still bathed in the successes of the past and a "competitive at all levels of AC Milan," the specter, who will take up next year with a team, "which is competitive with Inter." Mind you, the same Internet that we have downgraded (with Kakà) in the past few seasons, at 10 to 20 points. How do you want to conceal the sale of the very best athletic player of the club and also seeks to address the absolutely necessary restructuring of aging team, particularly with an absolute novice on the coach seat, yet is still in the stars.
Above all, we speak of a financial (Fininvest) as a club owner who makes in profits - the other way, this means that the 30 or 60 or 90 million loss, which appear in Fininvest in the balance sheet may be tax deductible. ) From the nominal loss (balancing of the ACM by the Fininvest is always deducted, that would be half gone well as taxes to the state. So while Fininvest has pushed 65 million this year to balance the 2008 budget, which saved more than half in taxes. If you still herausrechnet now that Berlusconi are not even 100% of Fininvest, the actual financial loss to our little Sun King, of course, much lower than the figures quoted are always so happy in the media. Since the children Marina and Pier Silvio Berlusconi one interista ( "hear, hear) have taken over the leadership of Fininvest, to which the annual losses of the ACM is a thorn in the eye and both call for an ACM, the" pay for themselves ". That is what we see at the moment and Silvio Berlusconi has a) no more need for the moment at ACM as image-makers and dissolve b) currently pressing sites (divorce, Noemi, financial) crisis.
Silvio Berlusconi, the shadow president, is currently facing the challenge of dealing with the financial demands of his wife, who recently filed for divorce. He has an economically troubled country, which he headed indeed also explain that lean years will hesitate and give the taxes and falling incomes beleaguered population that belt-tightening needs. And he's probably the most important point, given an unshakable of all scandals, the parliamentary majority is no longer a need for an unbeatable AC Milan as an image spin. Anyway, he no longer needs to AC Milan in order to portray himself as the victor, his power is intact. Politically embarrassing photos themselves untouched by our speculation about a relationship with the now 18-year-old Noemi. A presidency of the type "Santiago Bernabeu" goes smoothly over into a presidential-type "Giussy Farina" (and not even in his time of sale Baresi).
Only if the ACM changes from patrons model (Inter) to model business enterprises (Roma), marked a serious turning point in the strategy of the club's management. What does the majority of the tifosi at the palm, is not it 180 degrees, turning as such (Berlusconi can do with his money what he wants), but that our fans will be sold for a fool with the permanent "siamo a posto così" "Nesta comes back, we do not need a defender," "with Borriello we have a top striker." What disturbs me personally, are the continuing protestations that there is no "ridimensionamento" indicates that we "next year for the championship play" and that the team "through acquisitions may not improve because we have the best players already with us . Because we will win it - just like Reggina, Chievo and Udinese - exactly nothing.
Just play a few words about the strategy change, the new project on the future union policy and an objective announcement that await us years without a title, rather than the duration of Disco "club titolato più al mondo", the next Inter outclassed. Because I am completely sold out for 3 years for a fool. And at that point I prefer the sheikhs.
AC Milan sold its absolute star player to go against the will of the fans and the players themselves, to the upcoming contests with a team of players who could all fathers to be the girlfriend of the club president. Something fundamentally wrong here is running.
You are planning an article on the end of the era Ancelotti? I Would be very interested, because as a non-Milan fan reminds me of the farewell from the outside somehow considered at the end of Vicente Del Bosque in Madrid. So not really necessary, because the real cause of the current "crisis". And not really friendly in the parting words ... Berlusconi has never even taken a hand over her mouth, but why is he now night ride yet so incomprehensible and somehow corrupted in my (as I said distant) sight the memory of the great successes at Ancelotti. Still, there are now only four coaches to win twice the CL could, Del Bosque, Hitzfeld, Ferguson, and simply Carlo ...
Berlusconi returns give a damn about the memory Ancelottis. Rather, his comments are very typical of him: He basks in victories and defeats on the blame for loads from others. And because he would otherwise have to admit that the debt was for the lack of sporting results since 2006 (the CL 2007, a result of pride themselves on a far outgrown team), a direct consequence of his withdrawal as Milan are the president, he was just as guilty appoint Ancelotti . Of course, his statements are too "we have made tactical errors," "with Ronaldinho, we would have won everything," just blatant lies that will cover that no one with that since 2006 not named fresher, aging and unmotivated team would have won anything. For a reconstruction would be needed money, money that he has not paid and would rather not damage to its image, was just to blame the coach and the team is ok as it is ( "siamo a posto così).
Nice article, which has a layman like me some tells yo why Milan Kaka sold.
The desire for an investor (Schieche) I can not understand, however. In the end, it also runs at a sheikh in danger, that he eventually his property (unlikely) or lose the desire. Especially, the present cut in the expenditure of the ACM, coupled with the upcoming sporting descent you must really show everyone that the way to go, especially the popular clubs, is not the right thing. And I would choose myself hard to do, whether I athletic success, athletic arms race with the other top clubs, it's worth, that may be at a retreat of the sponsoring organization runs the shop front of the wall.
Well, we still plague us even now with a president who saw not his fortune, but has lost interest in his toys, so I much difference to an entry of the sheikhs did not. Separately, would be - sheikhs or not - of course, the competence of management to light that has the available funds so senselessly burned (Dida, Gourcuff, Seedorf, Pirlo ...) that would be expected that more money is only would result in more waste ...
Otherwise, I agree with you fully: rebuilding, restructuring, young players rather than superstars, revival of our once world's best youth department. I would like to hear a mature approach to the future - then I like to accept a few titelfreie years. Make it a place with much pomp honesty player commitments (Beckham, Dinho), and eternal harp celebrated on our past titles ( "club titolato più al mondo").
Especially the FC Barcelona has showed how it so, what can be achieved with an outstanding youth. Of course, the Catalans players like Henry or Eto'o rausgehauen have plenty of money, but players like Iniesta, Xavi and Messi are above all hold not changed for ludicrous transfer fees, but come from their own school.
Why Milan has set primarily in recent years on big names of aging "superstar", surprised me. For the latest, last year against Arsenal in the CL would have led to a rethink .... unless one has continued because intoxicated that you Manchester United has plastered over the year before (thanks to a superb Kaka).
Players have an economic and sporting value, the two are not always congruent. People like Seedorf (4 x CL), Ronaldinho (second best player in the world) or Beckham have an economically important image value that transcends the sporting value significantly. Club policy since 2006 was to take with as few resources as much money. Via sponsorships, ticket sales and television rights for the value of the above players are worth gold, they pay practically self Sporty they are naturally far beyond their zenith.
Thus, while economically it makes sense to keep Dinho and Kakà leave, is someting of course a disaster for the perspective of a sports team.
Interesting read between the lines of Ernesto Bronzetti Ernesto Bronzetti, our Transfermarktbeauftragten for Spain.
Who had indeed at 27.05. even expressed that Kakà remain at Milan. Now the big one:
"The hope that the Brazilian would remain at Milan, was born of a particular situation at this moment (...) that the club would have fresh capital to guarantee."
( "La speranza che il Milan nel brasiliano potesse restare nasceva da una situazione in quel momento (...) che avrebbe potuto garantire nuovi capitali alla società rossonera.")
Seems as if the SB negotiations with the sheik at 27.05. stopped and held at that time to separate instead of on Kakà.
maldini to lose by the natural aging process, and now kaka, through mismanagement, in a season to hurt condemned as milanisti. But what really baffled agrees one of the top5 players of the world is purchased. This was also - it seems - one of the few loyal top stars, who had almost a black-red-heart. not be comparable to or c.ronaldo ibrahimovic, which would obviously like to play again somewhere else.
what I was incredibly annoying by Galliani / berlusconi is the constant refocusing of the fact to "most successul club". Remember this is not herren that if one is not a competitive team more, sooner or later lose that title?
when I think of what the economy is in for money in circulation. one topbanker in Switzerland deserved happy times 5-10 mio. euro in the recent past. Now the global crisis has occurred, where all those images have to close schnürren - except obviously real madrid - but how the hell are 100M. An alleged real help companies in crisis?
ac milan was / is a global brand that investors would view my locker - found out what part of the world whatsoever - have raised at least this amount.
But no one would rather sell the guarantor for sporting success (or not paved kaka manU alone against the last successful cl ..) and invested in the recent past rather indiscriminately into the prairie out emerson (, ronaldinho, beckham, sheva ..) with these kaka transfers of millions would have to be refinanced almost.
I am completely disoriented to time. I was lacking a concept simply. as you say we are all good fans who grew up in the epoch "calcio moderno". We, therefore, almost accustomed to success. However, it is to me not only to success in this instance, but to a certain structure or one concept. aground since the time when maldini about 10 colored players (Desailly, davids, Reiziger, ba, kluiver, Bogarde ...) I've never found a lack of concepts such as in the past 2-3 years. carlo his job was good, but he placed too much for me to earlier semester, so I was happy to have a fresh wind on the bank which perhaps would not waste talent like Gourcuff. Now, the fact that it has sold everything into perspective kaka. the future is more uncertain than ever. milanisti the split and re-positioning device for a self-supporting implementation of this agreement is with their slogans (club titolato piu al mondo ...) is not suitable. should be in the next 2-3 years of inevitable success, they've done it - the brand-ac milan - damage sustained. ie it is for investors annhähernd no longer be as attractive as now.
silvio allowed this to go away, because he started the project and built the brand. but without success it loses its consent and with decreasing support, loses it to a make. Hopefully silvio discovered with increasing greisenalter not this unknown attribute of his nature.
byebye to: maldini the past captain / kaka (the future captain)
Nice post. True words, true words! I write my fingers to the bone for weeks that my main criticism is that I lack any concept in recent years, and no transparency. Of course, you can sell Kakà, like every other player also. The fans only last for much more relaxed when they would clearly say what!
The sale Kakas is clear at least since January and has already taken in early May to Perez incognito with the Milan-grandees and hammered the contract in sackcloth and bags. Whether the rumored offer from City's ever been, we will not know, but already at the time the runway was clear real. The rest you have to read between the lines: "I will stay at Milan until my goals coincide with those of the association" and "I wanted to stay at Milan, but ..." To that extent, he has never lied, he would prefer a competitive Milan remained after the change in the Association's strategy was evident that Kaka's goals is no longer precisely with those of the association. And so he has just gone to a club that was big enough for someone like him. The whole heart-pain nonsense we can - as always when you hear these words - deleting.
I am not even believe that Kakà was sold to offset the current balance. SB has prescribed austerity Milan one, and today again reiterated that Milan never again allowed to write in the red. Let us take the testimony of a few months ago, that must be curbed spending on players' salaries, currently about 120 million to 90 million. At that moment it was clear that Kakà has to go - in theory could have been the 18-million-gross-man, of course, can also hold, but then the rest of the team to achieve the above goal would have to be brutally runtergestutzt. And even then, would have opened a gulf between the income Kakas and the other players (probably deserve even more than 2 million). Unthinkable alternatives. And these policies will lead to a need within 1-2 years Pato away.
Just yesterday I read a study that Real has been in the first season of Kakà through merchandising, sponsorship, subscriptions, tickets, image enhancement, WHATEVER occupies approximately 75 million - of the transfer itself is interesting, therefore, that we will not manage it. But with us - after all, the inventor of the calcio moderno - there are also 20 meters around the stadium en masse to buy fake jerseys. Of course, sowas counterproductive. Only one directorate like ours fills the team with ex-players such as Ronaldinho on (through a series of half-handed in players like Abate, Paloschi & Co. was funded), drags mummies at exorbitant salary costs through the midfield (Seedorf, Pirlo), or acting same as a retirement home for 9 million gross (Dida). Of course, one might have taken Kakà. But to do that Berlusconi would have serious strategic error to admit in the club's leadership. And Berlusconi, who admits a mistake, that just as life on Mars: No such luck is he!
The division will thus have been agreed, Kakà Ronaldo was just as smart as the time when moving from Inter to Real. The issue was also the club, but it has managed to sell the players as traitors and draw the ire of the fans alone on them. In Kakà is not successful and all of the anger is directed against the club and its owner. Rightly, too, for the elegant solution would have been easy, the new club strategy (Ridimensionamento, max. 90 million salary cap, club must be self-sustained, we have to communicate a new project) clean and clear, to explain what exactly it intends and with whom. Ie who will coach, which players go who are called in, is played with what system and what are the short-or medium-term objectives of the club. Nothing of the sort has happened. Instead, it has lost its way on the old slogans, today still babbling of CL and "club titolato più al mondo" Labert something about "we will try everything to keep him" or "nothing is decided, let's talk Monday." Well, the club has not only said nothing to the change in strategy, but has also yet to convict dozens of times entirely objective of the lie. That could have exploited prima Kakà, for lying in the literal sense of not yes. SB and AG already.
Phew, I doubt that can refinance the transfer spending of Real Madrid for Kaka and now the € 94,000,000 (!) For the former best footballers in the world. This has been under Beckham, Figo, Zidane does not work. But well, as long as the UEFA approves it that clubs like Real Madrid are allowed to work entirely outside any reality, and also uses for advertising purposes, nothing will change.
The Milan is now also true of you mentioned the inventor of the "Calcio moderno not without" a certain irony. On the other hand, AC Milan make something for me "sympathetic" because he once again just a little bit closer to reality. The whole construct of modern football, with crazy transfer fees and player salaries in U.S. sport level will hopefully sooner or later, drive up the wall.
Boh. Refinance in the strictly economic sense is not to let it, especially if you equip the club with several world stars. The kids even buy the jersey from either Ronaldo or Kaká. Then there are numerous "soft" revenue qua advertising effectiveness, visibility, increase brand value, etc., which can be quantified not so simple. Agree, but I want that real hyper at the moment the wheel. Apparently yes Platini currently working on a solution, within 2-3 years, which only wants to allow more clubs to keep their total assets under control. The hope dies at least modified.
I had expressed myself in another place like this:
"The system soccer is subject to the same economic rules as all other sectors of the economy, a football club is a business enterprise. This is football is not in a vacuum, according to its own laws, functioning discourse, but the money circulating in the football system are evaluated economically as well as in all other industries. Intermediate excesses and bubbles - are compensated in the medium term - always, until a realistic converged "market value" of the product and the football players.
2000, the Neuer Markt shares internet bubble has burst. In 2006, the real estate bubble in the U.S. and UK, 2008/09 have collapsed completely overwrought, the financial markets. It is not unrealistic to assume, that even the system collapses into a football with his current form and current totals. 100% of all investors are spending money only if the expected result is consistent with the issues in a healthy relationship. Even football clubs print money, but distribute it only: you take and give out. The current of real price paid for Kakà assumes that the player is worth it - under the assumption that change is not sick today's conditions in football in the future. The major football clubs currently living on credit as well as, until recently, investment banks and the U.S. American house builders moved away - until someone has the carpet and) realistic assessments of actual values on the other side suddenly grotesque overstatement (= debts against.
Let's wait for 1-2 years and we will see whether the sale Kakas the height of the bubble is not even - economically - was a brilliant coup, while other clubs broke away from the scene. Also quite possible. "